Caroline S. Hau awarded 2021 Grant Goodman Prize in Philippine Historical Studies


The Philippine Studies Group of the Association for Asian Studies is pleased to award the Grant Goodman Prize in History and Historical Studies for 2021 to Caroline Sy Hau for her substantial contributions to Philippine historical studies. Hau is Professor of English and Literature at the Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University, Japan.

The University of the Philippines Valedictorian earned her subsequent graduate degrees at Cornell University. Since receiving her doctorate in 1998, Professor Hau has been a leader in Philippine historical and literary studies with numerous books, edited books and journal special issues. She has also published 37 peer reviewed book chapters and journal articles. During her career she has received many accolades including the Philippine National Book Award (seven times), the Gintong Aklat Award and the Philippine Free Press Literary Award (twice).

The body of her work has greatly enhanced Philippine literary studies and has added new dimensions to the study of the nation’s history in terms of the nation’s gender relationships, Chinese ethnicity, politics and political development.

The Philippine Studies Group is pleased to acknowledge the outstanding scholarly achievement that Professor Caroline Hau has shown throughout her career and confer upon her the 2021 Grant Goodman Prize in Philippine History and Historical Studies.

Paul A. Rodell

Chair, Grant Goodman Committee

Philippine Studies Group


Following are remarks given by Vicente Rafael at the 2021 PSG meeting where the award was announced:

                       A Tribute for Carolyn Sy Hau, winner of the 2021 Goodman Prize

I am very pleased to announce this year’s winner of the Grant Goodman Prize: Prof. Carolyn Sy Hau. Though she is, strictly speaking, not a historian, you can see how everything she writes is informed by a keen historical sensibility. At one point, I recall Benedict Anderson referring to her as one of the premiere historians of the Philippines. It’s not hard to see why. Not only is she one the leading scholars of Filipino-Chinese culture; she has also written about literary history and elite political cultures in ways that are powerful and compelling.

Carol’s books on nationalism and literature are classics in the field, and combine a sophisticated theoretical approach with close readings of a range of texts from the nineteenth to the twentieth century. A prodigious researcher and writer, she has managed the remarkable feat of either publishing her own books or editing collections of essays nearly every other year for the last decade.

Each of Carol’s books has reshaped historical studies on the Philippines. Read together, her first two books, Necessary Fictions (2000) and On the Subject of the Nation (2004), constitute the most analytically sophisticated account of postwar Philippine literary history, accounting for the shifts in the genre and the evolving nationalist consciousness that these novels convey.

Her landmark book, The Chinese Question (2014), is the only account of the evolving meanings of being Chinese in the Philippines, from the emergence of the colonial-era Chinese mestizo class to the present discourse on Chinese-Filipino/“Tsinoys.” Her account of the Tsinoy as the new mestizo, culturally integrated and imbibed with the social and economic capital that stems from various forms of “Chinese” influence within Southeast Asia, is an unparalleled account of a new cultural formation that few scholars have even noticed. Looking at Chinese contributions to Filipino nationalism and communism, The Chinese Question also examines the provincial Chinese, the fraught relationship between the Chinese and the state in the last quarter of the 20th century, and the “integration” of the Chinese in Filipino popular culture.

In another important book, Elites, and Ilustrados, Carol synthesized the vast literature on the ilustrado and altered our view of various topics, from Marcosian developmentalism and crony capitalism to state-sponsorship overseas work. The book provides a much-needed methodological corrective to studies of the Philippine elite that only focus on the oligarchy’s patrimonial features. These works see corruption and rent-seeking as the be-all and end-all of works in the Philippine political economy. However, Carol shows that the history of Philippine elite/s must be understood not only through the Philippine political economy’s cliches but also through culture and a rigorous re-reading of macroeconomic theory. That a literary scholar has written a work the alters our views of twentieth-century economic history is a testament to Carol’s breadth and her endless capacity to evolve as a thinker.

Carol’s latest book, Interpreting Rizal, is an incisive set of essays that returns her to the key works of Jose Rizal, where she reconsiders, among other things, the central role that Maria Clara plays in Rizal’s Noli and the national hero’s place in an emerging pan-Asian anti-colonial imagination.

Aside from authoring several prize-winning books, Carol has also collaborated with various colleagues to produce a number of edited collections on a dizzying array of topics. These include: “The Best of Tulay: An Anthology of Chinese Filipino Literature in English, Tagalog, and Chinese. With Benedict Anderson, she co-edited Carlos Bulosan’s All the Conspirators; and with the Thai scholar-and-public intellectual Kasian Tejapira Traveling Nation-Makers: Transnational Flows and Movements in the Making of Modern Southeast Asia. Carol also co-wrote in Japanese with Prof. Takashi Shiraishi, How is China Changing East Asia? The 21st Century Regional System; andwith the writers Katrina P. Tuvera and Isabelita O. Reyes Querida: An Anthology (2013), a compilation of poems, essays, and book excerpts that looks at the role of the mistress in Philippine politics and society. She also edited with J.Paul Manzanilla,  Remembering/Rethinking EDSA, a compilation of essays and poems that asks us to reconsider the significance of the 1986 “People Power Revolution” that ended the 15- year rule of the Marcos dictatorship, along with Elite: An Anthology,

It is well worth noting that Carol is also an award-winning fiction writer. Her literary works include: Recuerdos de Patay and Other Stories (2015), Demigods and Monsters: Stories (2019), and Tiempo Muerto (2019), all of which reflect a sensibility honed in exile and deep political engagement. That she writes literature and doesn’t simply study it is a tribute to the capaciousness of her thinking and wide range of her talents.

Carol’s significance can be gauged by the fact that she has become one of the most widely known Filipina scholars in Asia and the world. Her position at Kyoto makes her a valuable interlocutor in the Asian and Southeast Asian study of the Philippines. This intra-regional concern with Philippine Studies is seen in the journal she edits and in the many conferences she has organized. She has also trained a number of Japanese graduate students who have been doing important research that open up our understanding of less studied fields such as economic history, urban anthropology and domestic labor. Thanks to Carol’s active interventions, many Filipino scholars have received fellowships at Kyoto to carry out their work and interact with Japanese students and faculty.

Last but not least, Carol has been a true institution-builder, a scholar who believes in bringing Southeast Asian studies back to Asia. She was instrumental in launching the quadrennial Philippine Studies Conference in Japan (PSCJ) and the Southeast Asian Studies in Asia (SEASIA) consortium. She has also been a key contributor to our field’s most important journal: Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints (PSHEV). If she is not writing for the journal, she is either reviewing, contributing interviews, facilitating its conferences, or guest editing.

For all these reasons, Caroline Sy Hau is richly deserving of the Grant Goodman Prize. We heartily congratulate her for winning this award.

–From the nominating letters of Vicente L. Rafael, Patricio Abinales and Lisandro Claudio


The following are remarks delivered by Dr. Hau at the 2021 PSG meeting on receiving the award.

Thank you very much, Paul, Vince, for the kind words.

I’m truly privileged and humbled to be a recipient of this year’s Grant Goodman Prize, for which I am grateful to the Philippine Studies Group for your vote of confidence. This is an unexpected honor, all the more so because I think of myself more as a student of history than as a bona fide historian. 

I got interested in Philippine history because I was interested in Philippine literature. From the beginning, I realized that to better understand a literary work, one had to attend closely not only to the workings of the text, but to its materiality and historicity as an artefact and as a dynamic process of language-use, meaning-making, and intervention in the world.  Text and so-called context are so mutually implicated in each other that it makes no sense to speak of the “background” of a literary work. Rather, one needs to think about words and texts in motion, of  literature as an ineluctably temporal and for that reason historical phenomenon of world-making.

Philippine literature and history have not always been separate disciplines, nor were they separate from other fields of inquiry.  The members of the Propaganda Movement dabbled freely in pursuits ranging from writing novels and essays to collecting insects and folklore to archival research to fencing to obtaining membership in learned societies.

Recall, too, that Teodoro Agoncillo first gained public recognition as a prize-winning Tagalog poet and short story writer. While he was careful to distinguish the historical and literary imaginations, history and literature tended to bleed into each other in his most influential work, The Revolt of the Masses (Aguilar 2020, 145). Critics have a point in arguing that Agoncillo’s literary blandishments (ibid., 176) sometimes compromised the historical accuracy of Revolt. More significantly, his character studies of Bonifacio and the masses left a lot to be desired.

But it is telling that two of the most penetrating critiques of Agoncillo, by Neferti Tadiar (2004) and Filomeno V. Aguilar, Jr. (2020), were written by scholars who were trained, in Neferti’s case, as a literary critic and, in Jun’s case, as a management engineer and sociologist.

Students of literature concern themselves with looking closely at the ways in which storytelling highlights or suppresses the very presuppositions that shape it and the ways in which narratives appeal to their readers as plausible representations of reality. These concerns, too, are shared by historians as they deal with the challenges of using archival and other materials and their crafting of their own historical narratives and studies (see White 1978, 58).

Whatever the methodological and theoretical differences between literature and history—in part a consequence of their institutionalization and professionalization as distinct fields—they have in common a keen awareness of the imperatives, the political, intellectual, and artistic stakes, and also the pitfalls and potentials, of interpretation.

I continue to draw inspiration from Resil Mojares, a recipient of the Grant Goodman prize, who started his career as a fictionist, and who has characterized his method of doing research that freely ranges across the disciplines of politics, history, literature, anthropology, and cultural studies as a form of “border raiding” (Mojares 2017, 1). In fact, a quick look at the work of previous recipients of this prize shows that this has indeed been more the rule than the exception. These days, though, I must say that I enjoy reading works of history, and also physics, far more than works of literary, cultural, and art theory and criticism. 

We live in a time of intellectual and political ferment. Philippine Studies has expanded its scope and concerns beyond the ambits of methodological nationalism and US-Philippines bilateralism, even as scholars are now better armed to range across local, sub-regional, national, regional, transregional, and global scales of analysis.  The imperative to go beyond academia and engage with Filipinos and other peoples remains. Border-raiding involves not only crossing disciplinary or area boundaries, but many other boundaries as well, not least social, imaginative, and political.  

May we continue to learn from each other and from our other colleagues in Asian Studies and, just as important, beyond. Let us engage in the venerable art of border-raiding together.

Maraming salamat at mabuhay tayong lahat!

Works Cited

Aguilar, Filomeno V.  2020. “What Made the Masses Revolutionary?: Ignorance, Character, and Class in Teodoro Agoncillo’s The Revolt of the Masses,” Philippine Studies 68 (2): 137-78.

Mojares, Resil B. 2017. Interrogations in Philippine Cultural History. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press

Tadiar, Neferti Xina.  2004.  Fantasy-Production: Sexual Economies and Other Philippine Consequences for the New World Order.  Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

White, Hayden.  1978. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism.  Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Tmrw 5/5 12pm EDT: Kathleen Cruz Gutierrez on Botany, Empire, and Environmental Humanities in the Philippines and Beyond”

“A Conversation on Botany, Empire, and Environmental Humanities in the Philippines and Beyond”

Kathleen Cruz Gutierrez
Assistant Professor, Department of History, University of California, Santa Cruz

In this open-ended conversation, Kathleen Cruz Gutierrez will discuss current and forthcoming research on the intersections of botany, empire, and vernacular plant knowledge in the Philippines. Moving between Southeast Asian Studies, the environmental humanities and history, Dr. Gutierrez will encourage us to think in new ways about Philippine proto-national and regional floristic space, and challenge historians to question assumptions about the oversimplified intellectual divide between Spanish and US imperial projects. The discussion will be moderated by CSEAS chair, Erik Harms, and will build in ample time for questions from and discussions with the audience.

Kathleen “Kat” Cruz Gutierrez is Assistant Professor in the Department of History at the University of California, Santa Cruz, where she teaches courses on modern Southeast Asia, the Philippines, science, and the environment. She completed her Ph.D. in Southeast Asian Studies with a Designated Emphasis in Science and Technology Studies (STS) at the University of California, Berkeley. A specialist of colonial botany, Dr. Gutierrez is completing a manuscript drawn from her dissertation, tentatively titled Sovereign Vernaculars: Philippine Botany at the Dawn of New Imperial Science. Her forthcoming anthology contributions include a genre-bending meditation on the Imelda Marcos toad lily in The Mind of Plants (Synergetic Press, 2021) and a study of the “white space” behind the naming of Cycas wadei in Empire and the Environment: Confronting Ecological Ruination in the Asian-Pacific and the Americas (University of Michigan Press, 2021). Presently, with Paul Michael L. Atienza (Anthropology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign), she is guest co-editing a special issue on Philippine STS for Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints. Dr. Gutierrez also co-coordinates the STS Futures Initiative, a professionalization workshop series for STS-inclined humanities graduate students. When not perched at her desk, she watches Forensic Files with her dad and poorly identifies birds in Oakland, CA

Wednesday, May 5, 12:00 Noon

Live Via Zoom  Register Here >>

2021 APSA Asia Workshop – deadline 5/31/21

A message from Lara Jolicoeur of the American Political Science Association:

“I’m writing to inform you of an open Call for Applications for APSA’s Virtual Asia Workshop for early-career scholars based in East and Southeast Asia. The Asia Workshops are a great way to develop research alongside scholars with similar interests and extend networks across East and Southeast Asia and the United States. I hope that you can pass this information along to the Philippine Studies Group community, and to any others who may be interested in this opportunity.   

The virtual summer program will be conducted as series of weekly zoom sessions from mid-July through mid-August. The workshop will bring together up to 12 selected scholars to advance research related local governance and decentralization across Asia. Following their full participation of the workshop, all fellows will receive three-years membership to APSA. The deadline to apply is May 31.  

Additional information and application instructions are available online on the Asia Workshop website. We appreciate your help in circulating this unique opportunity.”  

Pattana Kitiarsa graduate student paper prize; submission deadline: 4/30/21

The AAS Southeast Asia Council’s annual prize recognizes emerging scholarship in the field of Southeast Asian studies, from any disciplinary perspective. Graduate students at any stage, enrolled at the time of submission, are eligible and welcome to apply. The committee invites papers that fit the definition of “conference papers,” i.e. of a length and scope that can be presented on an AAS panel, and that make an intellectual and/or methodological contribution to the study of Southeast Asia.

The prize honors the memory of Pattana Kitiarsa, who was Associate Professor in the Department of Southeast Asian Studies, National University of Singapore. He was born in the northeastern Thai province of Nong Khai and maintained his roots in this Lao-speaking region. As a scholar, teacher, and friend he touched many people’s lives. Sadly, Pattana passed away from cancer at the age of 46. With his passing the field lost one of its leading scholars of Southeast Asian labor, religion, class, and media.

Please submit your 2021 AAS Virtual Annual Conference paper, proof of current doctoral program registration, and accepted AAS panel abstract in PDF format up until April 30, 2021 to Submissions should be up to 10,000 words maximumPapers received after April 30, 2021 will not be considered. Any questions regarding the prize can be sent to the same email address.

The award of $500 and a certificate will be presented at the 2022 AAS Annual Conference in Honolulu, Hawaii. The Southeast Asia Asia Council of the AAS will also provide a sum of up to $400 to the winner of the prize to partially cover the cost of his or her travel to the 2022 Honolulu Conference, where the winner will be recognized at the AAS Presidential Address/Awards Ceremony.

Special lecture at UW by Walden Bello on 4/9

Shared at the request of the UW-Madison Center for Southeast Asian Studies:

“Far Right Regimes: A Global Comparison” by Walden Bello (Former MP of the Republic of the Philippines, Adjunct Professor of Sociology at SUNY – Binghamton)

Friday, April 9, 2021 | 12:00 PM CDT | via Zoom

Description: An exploration of similarities and contrasts among far-right regimes across the globe focusing on why they came to power, why they stay in power, and what their strengths and vulnerabilities are.

Here is a link to the Facebook event page.

Lecture by Nerissa S. Balce, “Filipina Abjection: Empire and Fascism in Duterte’s Republic” April 1st – Rice University

The Chao Center for Asian Studies (CCAS) at Rice University is continuing its 2020-21 Transnational Asia Speaker Series (TASS) on Thursday, April 1, 2021 with Nerissa S. Balce giving a lecture titled “Filipina Abjection: Empire and Fascism in Duterte’s Republic.” 

This event will be held via Zoom, and registration information is available at:

If you have any questions about this event, please contact the Faculty Host for this event, Alden Sajor Marte-Wood (

SEA Visiting Professor Position at Ohio

Ohio University’s Center for International Studies is seeking applicants for the Frances M. and Stephen H. Fuller Visiting Professorship in Southeast Asian Studies. The successful candidate will be a tenured Professor or Associate Professor (or equivalent at their home institution) with a record of scholarship that has contributed significantly to advancing the understanding and appreciation of Southeast Asia and its peoples.

The job posting will close on 4/20/21.

More information here:

UCB library update & PSG mtg reminder

Dear PSG Folks, A couple of days ago I circulated a call opposing a proposed closing of the SEA library at Berkeley, and I’m happy to share an update that the proposal has been rescinded–see this announcement for more information. Also, I’ll just remind you that the PSG meeting begins in 2.5 hours. Those who have already registered have already received a link; it will be re-sent half an hour before the meeting begins to those who have registered. If you haven’t yet registered you can still do so at the link below. –Megan

FYI, call to defend the CCSF Philippine Studies department

Dear PSG Folks, Pls. see below another call for action (petition-signing) to defend the Philippine Studies Department at the City College of San Francisco. Thanks to Oona Paredes for sharing this with us. –Megan

Hi everyone,

I just wanted to circulate this petition that you might be interested in as members of the PSG.

The Philippine Studies Department of City College of San Francisco is currently under threat of closure, and they are trying to rally support in time for a CCSF Board of Trustees meeting later this week. The details:

The petition against shutting down the department is on GoogleDocs here:

If the link doesn’t work, try to access it via this Facebook post 

Here is a fact sheet about the department, which is now 50 years old.



FYI, call to defend the SEA library at UC Berkeley

***update March 24: The proposal has been rescinded! Thanks to all who signed and wrote. See


Dear PSG Folks, Please read below a call for action (petition-signing, letter-writing) in support of protecting the South and Southeast Asia Library at Berkeley. Thanks to Kat Gutierrez for the message to circulate. –Megan

Campus leadership at the University of California, Berkeley, has proposed to permanently close the South and Southeast Asia Library (S/SEAL). Opened in 1970, the S/SEAL has been an institutional hub for the advancement of South and Southeast Asian studies at Berkeley and for experts and scholars in the fields. It hosts an impressively curated collection on the Philippines and most recently acquired the personal library of the late Philippine anthropologist Harold C. Conklin. The campus decision has been made in order to increase office space to meet the expansion of Berkeley’s Doe and Moffitt libraries and to integrate the specialized collection into other existing circulating libraries.
Members of the South and Southeast Asian studies community at Berkeley and beyond vehemently oppose this move. We identify the academic value and importance of maintaining a collection in a single location. The threatened closure comes at a time when growing anti-Asian sentiment in the United States demands the protection–if not expansion–of spaces dedicated to the intellectual and moral uplift of Asian communities. Berkeley has been a historic leader in the field of Southeast Asian studies. To shutter such a scholarly resource will undoubtedly impact future generations of Southeast Asianists. 

To support the effort to stop the imminent closure, please consider signing this petition initiated by the undergraduate community at Berkeley. The campus is also accepting public comment until April 9th. Please submit your comment to Prof. Jeffrey Mackie-Mason, University Librarian —; Prof. Anthony Cascardi, Dean of Arts and Humanities —; Prof. Raka Ray, Dean of Social Sciences —; and Prof. Oscar Dubón, Vice Chancellor for Equity and Inclusion — Please cc the following emails when sending your comment: (the official “call for public comment” email) and (the organizers of this effort aim to preserve all letters sent in protest of the proposed closure of the South/Southeast Asia Library).
For recent writing on the proposed closure, please see ” University Library proposes changes to South/Southeast Asian Library, campus community voices concerns” and the editorial “Don’t close South/Southeast Asia Library,” both of which appear in The Daily Californian.
For further information, please contact Kathleen Cruz Gutierrez at

Kathleen Cruz Gutierrez (s/her/siya), Assistant ProfessorDepartment of History, University of California, Santa Cruz